![]() |
|||||||
|
Projects and Cases
|
|||||||
|
Get email updates & alerts!
Civil Liberties Defense Center
259 E 5th Ave, Ste 300 A Eugene, OR 97401 541.687.9180 ph 541.686.2137 fax info@cldc.org |
The Green Scare
"A massive and prolonged effort to change the social, political, and economic structure of a local environment cannot be characterized as a violent conspiracy simply by reference to the ephemeral consequences of relatively few violent acts." — Justice John Paul Stevens. NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware, 458 U.S. 886, 933 (1982). On December 7, 2005, one of the largest roundups of environmental and animal liberation activists in American history began. Using the code name "Operation Backfire," the FBI arrested seven people in four different states. Chelsea Gerlach, Darren Thurston, William Rodgers, Kendall Tankersley (Sarah Kendall Harvey), Kevin Tubbs, Daniel McGowan and Stanislas Meyerhoff were arrested for allegedly taking part in a wide variety of actions the government attributes to the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ALF). On that very same day, several people across the Pacific Northwest were subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury to be convened in Eugene, Oregon. One of those taken into custody, Darren Thurston (a Canadian citizen), was served with a subpoena and later indicted in US District Court with federal conspiracy charges and charges related to the arson of a horse corral near Susanville, California. Within days of the first arrests it was revealed that a paid informant, Jacob Ferguson, admitted to participating in several arsons and had given federal investigators and prosecutors information that allegedly supported the indictments. It was also revealed that Meyerhoff had agreed to be a federal cooperating witness almost immediately upon arrest and interrogation. On December 22, William Rodgers was found dead in his jail cell in Flagstaff, Arizona, from an apparent suicide. Rodgers worked at the Catalyst Bookstore and Infoshop in Prescott, Arizona, and was involved in ecological struggles for many years in different parts of the United States. On January 20, 2006, federal prosecutors and US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced a sweeping 65 count indictment, including two conspiracy charges, against 11 individuals relating to 17 different incidents in Oregon, Washington, Wyoming, Colorado and California. The indictment alleged that the accused were members of a fictional network, referred to in the indictments as "The Family," and that they had conspired to commit several acts of arson. The indictment charged various defendants with arson, attempted arson, and using and carrying a destructive device. The destructive device charge, 18 USC 924(c), carries a 30 year mandatory sentence, with a mandatory life sentence for a second conviction of this charge. The government used this charge and the conspiracy charge to coerce individuals to become informants by threatening them with multiple life sentences for acts of property destruction that caused no injuries. In addition to the six people arrested on December 7, the Oregon indictment also named Jonathan Paul, Suzanne Savoie, Joseph Dibee, Rebecca Rubin (Canadian citizen) and Josephine Overaker. Paul was arrested in Oregon a few days before the indictment was announced, and Savoie turned herself in soon after Paul's arrest. Dibee, Rubin and Overaker are believed to be out of the country. In the weeks that followed, the government coerced and intimidated the defendants with various threats, primarily life in prison. Five individuals were then revealed as "confidential sources" for the government's case. Subsequently, on February 23, 2006, Nathan Fraser Block and Joyanna L. Zacher were arrested in Olympia, Washington. The government issued a new indictment on March 15, 2006, which included Block and Zacher who were held in custody and facing life plus 1,115 years in prison for their minor roles in two separate arsons. During the two days of cooperating defendants plea deal hearings, the government announced that it would pursue upward enhancement of sentences for the six taking pleas, arguing that the federal terrorism enhancement guideline apply to their sentences as well. At the request of the federal government, Gerlach made a statement at the conclusion of her plea proceeding, denouncing her actions. At the hearings of Gerlach and Meyerhoff, the government disclosed these defendants provided information regarding new allegations which indicated additional arson incidents alleged to have occurred in Phoenix, Arizona, and the eastern district of Michigan, though neither was charged with these incidents as part of their deals. Several months earlier, Daniel McGowan's attorneys filed a motion on behalf of the noncooperating defendants compelling the government to disclose whether the National Security Agency (NSA) had conducted illegal surveillance and monitoring during the investigation. The government acknowledged that it did not know whether such surveillance existed, and the Court ordered the government to file a response to the motion. On November 9, 2006, the remaining District of Oregon defendants Joyanna Zacher, Nathan Block, Daniel McGowan and Jonathan Paul entered a global resolution plea deal. (Note; Briana Waters is not indicted in Oregon. She is the only noncooperating defendant in the Washington indictment and vigorously asserts her innocence. See below for more info.) Prior to their formal plea hearings, the four defendants withdrew their NSA motion. In the noncooperation plea agreements, the four defendants agreed to accept responsibility for their own roles in environmentally motivated property crimes, but did not agree to provide information or testify against anyone now or in the future. Complete, non—redacted plea agreements for these four defendants are publicly available. The Governement notified the noncooperating defendants that it would attemp to apply the terrorism enhancement, USSG 3A1.4, to them as well. The enhancement allowed for an additional 20 years to be added to any sentence. It may also result in serious consequences regarding their prison security designation and life after jail, such as employment, financial accounts, or travel outside the United States. This was the first ime in the history of the US that the government sought this enhancement for property crimes that were not intended, and did not, result in any injury or threat of injury to humans. During the November 9 plea hearing, Joyanna Zacher and Nathan Block each pled to one count of conspiracy, attempted arson, plus multiple arson charges based on their involvement at the Joe Romania Chevrolet car dealership in Eugene and the Jefferson Poplar tree farm. Daniel McGowan entered a plea to one conspiracy charge plus multiple charges of arson relating to sabotage at Superior Lumber and Jefferson Poplar. The government recommended that the three be sentenced to 92 months in federal prison. Jonathan Paul pled to one count of conspiracy and one count of arson for his minor role in the property destruction at the Cavel West Inc., horse slaughterhouse. He received a suggested sentence of 57 months in prison. During the hearing, McGowan made a statement to the court that "this plea agreement is very important to me because it allows me to accept full responsibility for my actions and at the same time remain true to my strongly held beliefs." Outside the courthouse, Jonathan Paul's sister Alexandra Paul read a statement that her brother "will continue to be a person deeply committed to the betterment of our society and the elimination of animal and human suffering." During a brief hearing on December 14, 2006, Gerlach and Meyerhoff entered guilty pleas to additional out–of–state prosecutions. Also on that day, sentencing dates were set for all Oregon defendants. These sentencing dates were revised and finalized during a March 2, 2007, hearing in which it was decided that sentencings would run from May 22 to June 5, 2007. A date of May 15, 2007 was also set for general arguments as to whether the Terrorism Enhancement, Section 3A1.4 of the federal sentencing guidelines, could generally apply to the Oregon defendants. On March 30, 2006, Briana Waters was arrested in Seattle, WA, in connection with an alleged arson at the University of Washington Center for Urban Horticulture in 2001. Waters, a California resident, is a violin teacher and mother of a young child. Waters was released from custody on March 31 and adamantly maintains her innocence to these charges. On May 10, 2006, Washington issued a superseding indictment. This indictment includes the destructive device charge, 18 USC 924(c), a 30-year mandatory sentence, for Waters. The indictment also added Tubbs and Solondz as defendants (with Bill Rodgers' alleged participation) for the UW arson. Tubbs' Washington charges are waived as a result of his plea deal. Other informants in this case include Jennifer Kolar, of Seattle, WA, and Lacey Phillabaum of Spokane, WA. On October 4, 2006, both Kolar and Phillabaum entered plea deals in the Western Washington US District Court, pleading guilty to conspiracy, arson and destructive device charges in relation to the Urban Horticulture property damage. In addition, Kolar pled guilty to charges relating to an attempted arson against the Wray Gun Club, sponsors of a turkey shoot, whose Colorado business allegedly had incendiary devices placed nearby (the alleged devices failed to ignite). Kolar's Colorado charges were transferred to the Western Washington District before the hearing. Charges against Kolar in relation to an alleged arson in Redmond, Oregon, of a horsemeat processing plant, will also be transferred to Washington federal court soon. During the hearing, Kolar received a suggested sentence of 5 to 7 years in federal prison despite facing a mandatory life sentence, Phillabaum, 3 to 5 years. Both Kolar and Phillabaum were released without bail following their pleas. On January 28, 2007, Phillabaum reported to a federal facility to begin voluntarily serving her sentence, but formal sentencing for both is unlikely to occur until after Briana Waters' trial. On April 6, California issued its indictments in connection with the 2001 horse corral fire near Susanville, CA. Justin Solondz was charged by the federal court in Sacramento, but is not in custody. Also indicted for the corral fire were Darren Thurston (whose plea on this charge was integrated into his general District of Oregon deal as a result of cooperation), Joseph Dibee and Rebecca Rubin. On May 18, 2006, a federal grand jury indicted Chelsea Dawn Gerlach, Stanislas Meyerhoff, Josephine Overaker and Rebecca Rubin for alleged involvement in the 1998 arson of the Vail ski resort. The Colorado federal court agreed to transfer these charges to Oregon where Gerlach and Meyerhoff have District of Oregon plea deals that incorporate their Colorado charges. On September 29, 2006, Gerlach and Meyerhoff entered guilty pleas during their District of Oregon arraignment for Vail-related charges; neither Meyerhoff nor Gerlach are expected to serve additional time in prison as a consequence of these pleas. Meyerhoff and Gerlach swore in court that Bill Rodgers was solely responsible for this arson. The government's sentencing memo indicates that Rodgers and Gerlach burned Vail and the others returned to Oregon prior to the arson. In a related but separate case, federal prosecutors in San Diego unsealed an indictment in February 2006, charging environmental and Native American activist Rodney Coronado with demonstrating how to use an incendiary device. After a lecture in 2003, Coronado, of Tucson, Arizona, answered a question about how he made an incendiary device used in an action that resulted in his arrest, conviction and four year prison sentence that he finished serving several years ago. Coronado was charged with distribution of information relating to explosives, destructive devices and weapons of mass destruction. Coronado's trial began on September 10, 2007. During the course of this trial, Coronado's defense counsel revealed an audio recording of the February 2006 speech, as well as Coronado's answer to questions from the audience at this event. As this evidence directly contradicted the sworn testimony of government witnesses, it was announced on September 19 that the jury in Coronado's trial was hopelessly deadlocked, with a majority of jurors voting for acquittal. Despite this mistrial, federal prosecutors continued their politically motivated attacks on Coronado, promising to not only bring the San Diego case to trial again, but also to open up another prosecution based on the content of speech given by Coronado in Washington, DC, during January 2003. Having fought the government's charges for almost two years, Coronado entered a plea deal for a one year prison sentence on December 14, 2007, so as to avoid the continuing malicious prosecutions against him, which could have led to a significantly longer sentence. Eric McDavid In another case of government repression against environmental activists, Eric McDavid stood trial in Sacramento, California beginning September 10, 2007. On September 27, McDavid was convicted of a single federal charge of conspiracy to destroy property by means of fire or explosives. This conviction was based on the testimony of a government provocateur, as well as that of McDavid's two co-defendants, who agreed to testify against him in exchange for reduced sentences. Jurors in McDavid's trial have indicated that they would have voted for acquittal, but for a single jury instruction. McDavid's lawyer is currently appealing this conviction, arguing for acquittal or a new trial. Misuse of Grand Juries On March 21, Camilo Stephenson was subpoenaed to a Denver, Colorado, grand jury and questioned about the 1998 Vail ski resort fire. He denied any knowledge of any of the incidents. Jeff Hogg and Burke Morris were subpoenaed to testify in front of federal grand juries on May 18, 2006, Hogg in Eugene, and Morris in Denver. Hogg refused to testify before the Eugene grand jury, and was held in contempt by Judge Michael Hogan and sent to jail. Hogg was then placed in custody, without having been charged with any crime. The unlawful grand jury was scheduled to expire on September 29, 2006. However, days before Jeff was to regain his freedom, the federal government extended this grand jury for six more months. In Colorado on May 28, 2006, Burke Morris answered limited questions asked by the Denver grand jury about his personal life, but denied any knowledge of other incidents he was questioned about. Morris later issued a statement, "I have the utmost respect for Jeff Hogg and hope all will support him during his incarceration for refusing to answer grand jury questions." On June 27, 2006, Jim Dawson of Olympia, WA, received a subpoena to appear before a grand jury at the Federal District Courthouse in Seattle, WA. This subpoena most likely came about as a result of his partner, Heather Moore, having been contacted by the FBI a few months earlier. Both consented to questioning by the FBI in lieu of grand jury appearances. After more than six months and following the global resolution of the remaining District of Oregon cases on November 9, 2006, the government finally agreed to free Hogg. On November 15, Hogg was released from the Josephine County jail in Grant's Pass, Oregon, rejoining his partner and community. Hogg commented shortly after release, "I'm happy to be free and to not have compromised my principles in the face of the abusive grand jury system." The government continues to threaten Hogg with another subpoena and more jail time. The federal government has called off Craig Rosebraugh's grand jury subpoena for now. On August 20, 2007, one individual in Seattle and one in Chicago received grand jury subpoenas, requesting their appearance on September 6 in Minneapolis, MN. These grand jury subpoenas appear to be based on statements made by government informant Ian Wallace, whom prosecutors have mentioned in relation to ecosabotage in the Midwest. These grand jury appearances were cancelled once lawyers communicated that their clients intended to "plead the 5th [Amendment]" to all questions.¬ÝAt this time, the FBI continues to make additional threats to activists around the county regarding grand jury subpoenas and investigations. Grand juries by law are authorized only to decide whether or not to bring new indictments. In this case, grand juries are being used to gather evidence to prepare for trial, an illegal use of the grand jury as defined by law. This runaway grand jury has been convened around the country to investigate this case and the larger environmental movement since 2000. Additional round-ups, subpoenas and arrests continue around the country. |
||||||
|
Join in the fight for civil liberties! Please support the Civil Liberties Defense Center. Site design by K. Ritley, 2006
|
|||||||